Policy Statement on the 340B Drug Pricing Program by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Congress established Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act—commonly referred to as the 340B Drug Pricing Program—in 1992.1 The 340B Drug Pricing Program requires manufacturers to provide substantial discounts for sales of covered drugs to covered entities as a prerequisite to qualifying for Medicaid reimbursement. Covered hospitals and other covered entities must limit the use of discounted drugs to the outpatient care of individuals who meet the program’s definition of a “patient,” among other requirements. The 340B Drug Pricing Program is administered by the Office of Pharmacy Affairs within the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the US Department of Health and Human Services.2 Currently, there are six types of hospitals that can qualify as covered entities under the 340B Drug Pricing Program on the basis of the hospital’s disproportionate share hospital (DSH) adjustment percentage and other factors.3 The DSH adjustment factor is a federal parameter established under Medicare as a proxy to identify hospitals with high levels of uncompensated care. In addition, there are 12 categories of nonhospital providers that can qualify for the 340B program on the basis of their eligibility for federal funding, such as federally qualified health centers.3 The financial implications of the 340B discount can be significant for a health care institution. The discount can substantially reduce the burden on covered entities that provide uncompensated or undercompensated care. In addition, drugs purchased by the covered entity at a discount can be sold to all individuals who meet the program’s definition of a “patient.” For purposes of the 340B program, a patient is an individual who is treated by a covered entity, regardless of their insurance status, not necessarily an individual who lacks adequate health care coverage. As a practical matter for eligible beneficiaries, this means that for patients who are covered by private insurance or Medicare, a covered entity participating in the 340B Drug Pricing Program can benefit financially from the difference between the discounted cost of the drug and the amount reimbursed by the patient’s insurance program. This difference, commonly referred to as the “spread,” can be quite significant when aggregated over a large number of patients. The impacts of the 340B Drug Pricing Program are especially significant in the area of oncology, given the integral role that drug therapies play in the treatment of individuals with cancer. ASCO members deliver oncology care to patients in substantial numbers both inside and outside of 340B settings. In this policy statement, ASCO provides a summary of issues and recommendations related to the 340B program for policymakers to consider from the perspective of professionals dedicated to the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
منابع مشابه
Notice regarding HRSA grant requirement--participation in the 340B drug pricing program--HRSA. Notice.
Section 602 of Public Law 102-585, the "Veterans Health Care Act of 1992," enacted section 340B of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act, "Limitation on Prices of Drugs Purchased by Covered Entities." Section 340B provides that a manufacturer who sells covered outpatient drugs to eligible entities must sign a pharmaceutical pricing agreement with the Secretary of HHS in which the manufacturer agr...
متن کاملSubsidizing Consolidation? Unintended Consequences of a Federal Drug Discount Program∗
Many salient profit incentives that health care providers face stem from government policies. We investigate hospital response to the 340B Drug Discount Program, a federal policy that substantially increases profitability of drug administration for about 45% of hospitals by entitling them to discounts of between 20% and 50% on drugs. Our primary empirical strategy is a fuzzy regression disconti...
متن کاملHospital Group Wants to Expand Section 340B Drug Purchase Program.
the House Ways and Means Committee on September 23. He explained that this would allow the hospitals to further stretch their limited resources and relieve them of the burden of carrying two separate inventories and pricing structures for inpatient and outpatient drugs. Theoretically, the Ways and Means Committee, in conjunction with Energy and Commerce and Senate Finance, could initiate author...
متن کاملComponents necessary for high-quality lung cancer screening: American College of Chest Physicians and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.
Lung cancer screening with a low-dose chest CT scan can result in more benefit than harm when performed in settings committed to developing and maintaining high-quality programs. This project aimed to identify the components of screening that should be a part of all lung cancer screening programs. To do so, committees with expertise in lung cancer screening were assembled by the Thoracic Oncolo...
متن کاملReporting of Financial and Non-financial Conflicts of Interest in Systematic Reviews on Health Policy and Systems Research: A Cross Sectional Survey
Background Systematic reviews are increasingly used to inform health policy-making. The conflicts of interest (COI) of the authors of systematic reviews may bias their results and influence their conclusions. This may in turn lead to misguided public policies and systems level decisions. In order to mitigate the adverse impact of COI, scientific journals require authors to disclose their COIs. ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of oncology practice
دوره 10 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014